Two hundred lower extremity osteoarticular allografts (in 200 patients) performed for aggressive or malignant bone tumors between 1976 and 1997 included 124 grafts of the distal femur, 46 of the proximal tibia, and 30 of the proximal femur. Seventy-four patients did not receive chemotherapy, and 126 received either adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. The diagnoses, mean ages, and length of followup were different for the two groups because most of the patients in the chemotherapy group had osteosarcoma, whereas the largest number in the control group had chondrosarcoma or parosteal osteosarcoma. The extent of the surgery was essentially the same for both patient groups, as is reflected by a low recurrence rate (7% for the control and 6% for the chemotherapy group). A statistical comparison of the various parameters showed that the infection, fracture, and amputation rates were the same, but the nonunion rate was markedly increased in the patients who received chemotherapy (32% versus 12%). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier studies showed that chemotherapy had a significant effect on outcome, with the success rates for the two groups being quite different (72% versus 56%). The results for the distal femur showed a greater effect than for either the proximal tibia or the proximal femur. Analysis of these data suggest the distal femur is perhaps the most prone to healing problems, possibly based in part on the extent of the surgery. A final study supports the concept that the results improved in later years, suggesting a modification or application of the drugs used, better selection of patients, and improvements in surgical technique.