Determining antioxidant activities of lactobacilli cell-free supernatants by cellular antioxidant assay: a comparison with traditional methods

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0119058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119058. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Antioxidant activity of lactic acid bacteria is associated with multiple health-protective effects. Traditional indexes of chemical antioxidant activities poorly reflect the antioxidant effects of these bacteria in vivo. Cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay was used in this study to determine the antioxidant activity of cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of 10 Lactobacillus strains. The performance of the CAA assay was compared with that of four chemical antioxidant activity assays, namely, DPPH radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging (HRS), reducing power (RP), and inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation (ILAP). Results of the CAA assay were associated with those of DPPH and ILAP assays, but not with those of RP and HRS assays. The inter- and intra-specific antioxidant activities of CFS were characterized by chemical and CAA assays. L. rhamnosus CCFM 1107 displayed a high antioxidative effect similar to positive control L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 in all of the assays. The CAA assay is a potential method for the detection of antioxidant activities of lactobacilli CFSs.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antioxidants / metabolism*
  • Biological Assay / methods*
  • Biphenyl Compounds / chemistry
  • Cell-Free System
  • Free Radical Scavengers / chemistry
  • Hep G2 Cells
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyl Radical / chemistry
  • Lactobacillus / metabolism*
  • Linoleic Acid / chemistry
  • Lipid Peroxidation
  • Oxidation-Reduction
  • Picrates / chemistry

Substances

  • Antioxidants
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Free Radical Scavengers
  • Picrates
  • Hydroxyl Radical
  • Linoleic Acid
  • 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program Nos. 2013BAD18B01, 2013BAD18B02, 2012BAD28B07, 2012BAD12B08), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31301407, 31200691), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program No. 2012CB720802), key projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the 12th Five- Year Plan (Nos. 2012BAD12B08, 2012BAD28B07), the 111 project B07029, and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.