Long-term results of the bioprosthesis in elderly patients: impact on quality of life

Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 May;71(5 Suppl):S244-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02515-2.

Abstract

Background: A wealth of data exists on acceptable mortality and morbidity for valve operations in older patients, yet information documenting quality of life is lacking.

Methods: From October 1974 to May 1998, 2,075 patients aged 65 years and older underwent valve replacement using a porcine bioprosthesis. There were 1,126 men (54.3%) and 949 women (45.7%) with a mean age of 73.9 years (range 65 to 104 years).

Results: The elective hospital mortality was 8.5% (158 patients), and urgent/emergent/salvage mortality was 25.8% (54 patients). Follow-up was completed for 1,863 patients (98.2%) and extended from 1 month to 23.0 years (mean 60.8 months) with a cumulative follow-up of 9,442.1 patient-years. At follow-up, surviving patients (n = 849) completed the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Survey. Results showed patients had a more favorable quality of life compared with control subjects matched for age and sex. Functional improvement was significant with 96.3% in New York Heart Association functional class I or II at follow-up. There were 74 valves that failed from all causes (33 aortic and 41 mitral valves). Actuarial freedom from valve failure at 9 years was 94.4%+/-1.1% and at 18 years was 83.7%+/-2.4%.

Conclusions: Valve replacement in older patients provides excellent functional improvement, reduces late cardiac events, and enhances quality of life.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / surgery
  • Bioprosthesis*
  • Cause of Death
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Valve Diseases / mortality
  • Heart Valve Diseases / surgery*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mitral Valve / surgery
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology*
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Quality of Life*
  • Reoperation
  • Survival Rate