Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study

Intern Med J. 2005 Nov;35(11):650-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00927.x.

Abstract

Aims: To develop a human research ethics committee (HREC) mutual acceptance (MA) model, based on the National Health and Medical Research Council's guidelines. The MA model aims to facilitate aspects of multicentre research and decrease the time taken to finalise the HREC review process.

Methods: Four HREC (The Alfred Hospital, Austin Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Melbourne Health) agreed to participate in a 13-month pilot project to evaluate the MA model. Evaluation included times from submission to approval and stakeholder surveys.

Results: Seventeen consecutive studies were submitted to the MA pilot project. Stakeholders agreed that the MA model was efficient and effective and that submission and review processes had improved, with a demonstrable reduction in the levels of duplication. There was a 27% improvement in approval times for multicentre studies.

Conclusions: Our (MA) model resulted in clear improvements in HREC processes and timelines. Stakeholder acceptance was high. This model provides a framework for a broader program of MA.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees / organization & administration*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / ethics*
  • Ethical Review / standards*
  • Ethics Committees, Research / organization & administration*
  • Ethics, Research
  • Guideline Adherence / organization & administration*
  • Guidelines as Topic*
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic / ethics*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Trust