Ethical issues in research to improve the management of malignant bowel obstruction: challenges and recommendations

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1 Suppl):S20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 25.

Abstract

Research to improve the care of patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is urgently needed. In particular, there is an urgent need for high-quality descriptive research, including prospective cohort studies, as well as randomized controlled trials to define optimal management strategies. However, investigators and clinicians face numerous barriers in conducting high-quality research in this patient population. These barriers include lack of funding, difficulties in identifying eligible patients, and a variety of practical and methodological challenges of designing these studies. In addition, there are a variety of ethical challenges that arise in the design and conduct of studies of MBO and particularly in the conduct of clinical trials. In this article, we address four categories of ethical issues: study design, recruitment, informed consent, and Institutional Review Board review. For each, we outline salient issues and suggest recommendations for enhancing the ethics of MBO studies, including interventional trials.

Publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Informed Consent
  • Intestinal Neoplasms / complications
  • Intestinal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Intestinal Obstruction / etiology
  • Intestinal Obstruction / therapy*
  • Palliative Care / ethics*
  • Palliative Care / methods
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic