Background: African Americans (AA) have higher rejection rates and poorer graft outcomes compared to non-AAs. Induction therapy is yet unproven in this high risk population.
Methods: This retrospective study compared the efficacy of induction therapy [IL-2 receptor antibodies (IL2RA) or thymoglobulin] vs. no induction.
Results: One hundred and seventy-five AA patients were included in this analysis. Patients were well matched for demographic and immunologic characteristics in the non-induction and IL2RA induction groups; the Thymoglobulin induction group had significantly higher risk patients. Significantly fewer episodes of acute rejection occurred at one yr in patients treated with thymoglobulin and IL2RA vs. no induction (18% vs. 47%, p = 0.003, 26% vs. 47%, p = 0.02). Three yr graft survival was significantly improved in the IL2RA group compared to the non-induction group (85% vs. 68%, p = 0.032). Despite the thymoglobulin group being at high risk, they had similar graft survival rates compared to both the IL2RA group (76% vs. 85%, p = 0.18) and the non-induction group (76% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that induction therapy (combining IL2RA and thymoglobulin) independently reduced the risk of both acute rejection and graft loss.
Conclusion: The use and type of induction therapy in AA patients significantly reduces acute rejection rates and may improve long-term graft outcomes in AA patients.