Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):485.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.015.

Abstract

Objective: We compared survival for women with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary radiation or radical hysterectomy.

Study design: Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer were examined. Radical hysterectomy was compared with primary combination external-beam and brachytherapy radiation.

Results: A total of 4885 patients were identified. Multivariate analysis showed that radical hysterectomy was associated with a 59% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.50). After stratification by tumor size, hysterectomy was associated with a 62% reduction in mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.48) for tumors that were <4 cm in diameter and a 49% improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.72) for tumors that were 4-6 cm in diameter. Among women with tumors that were >6 cm in size, survival was equivalent between radical hysterectomy and radiation.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that, in women with cervical cancer lesions of <6 cm, radical hysterectomy is superior to primary radiation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Brachytherapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Survival Rate
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / mortality
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / surgery*