Cost implications of ACGME's 2011 changes to resident duty hours and the training environment

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Feb;27(2):241-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1775-9. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Abstract

Background: In July 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) will implemented stricter duty-hour limits and related changes to the training environment. This may affect preventable adverse event (PAE) rates.

Objectives: To estimate direct costs under various implementation approaches, and examine net costs to teaching hospitals and cost-effectiveness to society across a range of hypothetical changes in PAEs.

Design: A decision-analytical model represented direct costs and PAE rates, mortality, and costs.

Data sources: Published literature and publicly available data.

Target population: Patients admitted to hospitals with ACGME-accredited programs.

Time horizon: One year.

Perspectives: All teaching hospitals, major teaching hospitals, society.

Intervention: ACGME's 2011 Common Program Requirements.

Outcome measures: Direct annual costs (all accredited hospitals), net cost (major teaching hospitals), cost per death averted (society). RESULTS OF BASE-ANALYSIS: Nationwide, duty-hour changes would cost $177 million annually if interns maintain current productivity, vs. up to $982 million if they transfer work to a mixture of substitutes; training-environment changes will cost $204 million. If PAEs decline by 7.2-25.8%, net costs to major teaching hospitals will be zero. If PAEs fall by 3%, the cost to society per death averted would be -$523,000 (95%-confidence interval: -$1.82 million to $685,000) to $2.44 million ($271,000 to $6.91 million). If PAEs rise, the policy will be cost-increasing for teaching hospitals and society.

Results of sensitivity analysis: The total direct annual cost nationwide would be up to $1.34 billion using nurse practitioners/physician assistants, $1.64 billion using attending physicians, $820 million hiring additional residents, vs. 1.42 billion using mixed substitutes.

Limitations: The effect on PAEs is unknown. Data were limited for some model parameters.

Conclusion: Implementation decisions greatly affect the cost. Unless PAEs decline substantially, teaching hospitals will lose money. If PAEs decline modestly, the requirements might be cost-saving or cost-effective to society.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Accreditation / economics*
  • Accreditation / trends
  • Costs and Cost Analysis / economics
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / economics*
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / trends
  • Hospitals, Teaching / economics*
  • Hospitals, Teaching / trends
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency / economics*
  • Internship and Residency / trends
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / economics*
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / trends
  • United States
  • Work Schedule Tolerance