Clinician perceptions of providing natural family planning methods in Title X funded clinics

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):35-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00107.x.

Abstract

Introduction: Natural family planning (NFP) methods are effective for contraception with proper and consistent use. However, only 1% of patients at federally funded Title X family planning clinics select NFP as a contraceptive method. The goal of this study was to understand from clinicians' perspectives the barriers and facilitators to providing NFP methods.

Methods: Six telephone focus groups were conducted with 29 clinicians from Title X clinics across the United States and Puerto Rico. A hermeneutic method was used to analyze data for related themes.

Results: The overarching theme from the study was that participants had a strong desire to teach their patients how their bodies work and to empower them to learn to control fertility. Four subthemes emerged: patient misinformation and misunderstanding about fertility; provider ideas about ideal types of candidates for NFP; inconsistent patient teaching strategies; and lack of time to teach NFP methods.

Discussion: There is a need for increased NFP training for providers and efficient NFP patient teaching strategies to meet the needs of patients with limited knowledge about fertility.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities / economics
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Education, Continuing
  • Family Planning Services / economics
  • Family Planning Services / methods*
  • Female
  • Fertility*
  • Financing, Government
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Natural Family Planning Methods*
  • Patient Education as Topic / methods
  • Puerto Rico
  • Sex Education / economics
  • Sex Education / methods*
  • United States