Relating physician's workload with errors during radiation therapy planning

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Mar-Apr;4(2):71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

Abstract

Purpose: To relate subjective workload (WL) levels to errors for routine clinical tasks.

Methods and materials: Nine physicians (4 faculty and 5 residents) each performed 3 radiation therapy planning cases. The WL levels were subjectively assessed using National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Individual performance was assessed objectively based on the severity grade of errors. The relationship between the WL and performance was assessed via ordinal logistic regression.

Results: There was an increased rate of severity grade of errors with increasing WL (P value = .02). As the majority of the higher NASA-TLX scores, and the majority of the performance errors were in the residents, our findings are likely most pertinent to radiation oncology centers with training programs.

Conclusions: WL levels may be an important factor contributing to errors during radiation therapy planning tasks.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Physicians / statistics & numerical data*
  • Radiotherapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Workload / statistics & numerical data*