A simple and objective assay was developed for the detection and quantitation of fetal-maternal hemorrhage with the use of flow cytometry. In vitro prepared control mixtures of 10%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.125%, and 0.06% D+ RBCs in D- RBCs were tested (8-11) different times by flow cytometry and gave mean % D+ results of 11.10%, 1.90%, 0.92%, 0.45%, 0.24%, 0.11%, and 0.05%. The coefficient of variation of preparing and testing these mixtures ranged from 11.0 to 15.9% for the 10-0.125% mixtures. Thus, flow cytometry was accurate, reproducible, and sensitive. Flow cytometry was compared with Du tests, rosette tests, and acid elution. The Du test was highly variable because it was not sensitive enough to detect a significant bleed (approximately 0.6%) in some cases and too sensitive (necessitating quantitation of an insignificant bleed) in others. The rosette test was too sensitive. Acid elution and flow cytometry results did not always agree; acid elution results were approximately twice as high as flow cytometry. The authors believe flow cytometric detection of D+ red blood cells to be more accurate than the detection of fetal hemoglobin by acid elution techniques, which is known to have poor reproducibility. Postpartum samples from 56 D- women who delivered D+ babies were tested. Fifty-two had fetal bleeds less than 0.3% by acid elution and flow cytometry; all had negative Du test results, but there were two false positive results with the use of the rosette technique. Four had significant bleeds (greater than or equal to 0.6%); in all four cases the flow cytometry results were lower than the acid elution results. The authors were able to quantitate a bleed of fetal RBCs, which were D+ only by the Du test, in a D- mother with the use of flow cytometry, and D+ RBCs in a mother whose RBCs were of the rare DVI mosaic phenotype. This would not have been possible with the use of the standard Du or rosette techniques.