Management of type 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations--current controversies

Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014;72(1):53-60.

Abstract

AC (acromioclavicular) joint dislocations are a common injury seen by physicians. Symptoms range from minor discomfort with activity to complete disability of the extremity. Although most orthopaedic surgeons agree on how to treat either mild (type 1-2) or severe (type 4-6) injuries, there is no consensus for treatment of type 3 injuries. This article reviews the relevant literature pertaining to the anatomy of the injury, evaluation of the patient, pertinent imaging as well as the controversial management of type 3 AC joint dislocations. With improvement in surgical techniques over the past 30 years, there have been many published studies evaluating both operative and non-operative care. Surgery has shown dramatic improvement in patient-rated outcomes; however, it is not always without complications. These risks in some patients may not be worth the potential surgical benefits. In type 3 AC joint injuries each patient and pathology must be carefully analyzed to ensure that the correct treatment option is chosen.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acromioclavicular Joint / physiopathology
  • Acromioclavicular Joint / surgery*
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Humans
  • Joint Dislocations / classification
  • Joint Dislocations / diagnosis
  • Joint Dislocations / physiopathology
  • Joint Dislocations / therapy*
  • Joint Instability / classification
  • Joint Instability / diagnosis
  • Joint Instability / physiopathology
  • Joint Instability / therapy*
  • Orthopedic Procedures*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Recovery of Function
  • Treatment Outcome