Relative incidence of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters in the lower versus upper extremities

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):913-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2304-7. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Abstract

Peripheral venous access in elderly, hospitalized patients is often challenging. The usual alternative is insertion of a central venous catheter, with associated risk for complications. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the relative incidence of phlebitis secondary to lower as compared to upper extremity intravenous catheters (IVCs) and associated risk factors. A non-randomized, observational, cohort-controlled study was carried out. Consecutive patients receiving a lower extremity IVC were enrolled and compared with patients receiving an upper extremity IVC. Patients were followed from insertion until removal of the IVC. The major endpoint was phlebitis. The incidence of phlebitis secondary to upper extremity IVCs was 3/50 (6 %) compared to 5/53 (9.4 %) in lower extremity IVCs (χ(2) Yates = 0.08, p = 0.776). Age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, site (arm versus leg, left versus right), and size of needle were not found to be risk factors for phlebitis according to univariate analysis. None of the patients developed bloodstream infection. In elderly patients with poor venous access, lower extremity IVCs are a reasonable and low-risk alternative to central venous catheters.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Catheter-Related Infections / epidemiology*
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / adverse effects*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Lower Extremity / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phlebitis / epidemiology*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Upper Extremity / pathology*