Gain-of-Function Research and the Relevance to Clinical Practice

J Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;213(9):1364-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv473. Epub 2015 Sep 27.

Abstract

The ongoing moratorium on gain-of-function (GOF) research with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus has drawn attention to the current debate on these research practices and the potential benefits and risks they present. While much of the discussion has been steered by members of the microbiology and policy communities, additional input from medical practitioners will be highly valuable toward developing a broadly inclusive policy that considers the relative value and harm of GOF research. This review attempts to serve as a primer on the topic for the clinical community by providing a historical context for GOF research, summarizing concerns about its risks, and surveying the medical products that it has yielded.

Keywords: coronavirus; gain of function; health policy; influenza; potential pandemic pathogens; science policy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomedical Research / standards*
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Influenza A virus / genetics
  • Influenza A virus / pathogenicity
  • Mice
  • Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus / genetics
  • Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus / pathogenicity
  • Mutation
  • Pandemics / prevention & control*
  • RNA Virus Infections* / prevention & control
  • RNA Virus Infections* / virology
  • Research Design / standards*
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / genetics
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / pathogenicity