Objectives: Modern passive middle ear titanium prostheses are filigree structures, resulting in poorer depiction on CT compared to prostheses used in the past. We compared the visibility of newer prostheses on cone beam CT (CBCT) to multi-detector CT (MDCT) with standard and lower dose in vitro, and analysed image noise and metal artefacts.
Methods: Six different titanium middle ear prostheses (three partial and one total ossicular replacement prostheses, two stapes prostheses) were implanted twice in formalin-fixed head specimens-first correctly and then with displacement. Imaging was performed using standard CBCT and MDCT as well as MDCT with lower dose (36 single imaging investigations). Images were analysed with knowledge of the used types of middle ear prostheses, but blinded with respect to the positioning in the specific case.
Results: On all images the type of prostheses and their positions could be clearly recognized. Their identifiability including their details was rated as statistically significantly higher for all CBCT investigations than for MDCT. MDCT with lower dose showed the worst results. No statistical differences were found in image noise and metal artefacts.
Conclusions: If available, CBCT should be preferred over MDCT in diagnostic evaluation of passive middle ear prostheses.
Key points: • Middle ear prostheses became more filigree, leading to poorer visibility on CT. • High spatial resolution and paraxial reconstructions are necessary requirements for imaging evaluation. • CBCT and MDCT can identify type and positioning of titanium prostheses. • Metal artefacts play a minor part in filigree titanium prostheses. • Regarding visualisation of prostheses details, cone beam CT aids the evaluation.
Keywords: Cone beam CT; Human cadaver specimen; Middle ear prosthesis; Multi-detector CT; Passive implant.