Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement

J Comp Eff Res. 2017 May;6(3):245-256. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0063. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

Abstract

Aim: To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers.

Materials & methods: Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations.

Results: Most respondents (94%) were familiar with CER and many (69%) reported having previously conducting some form of CER. Most respondents were familiar with (81%) and interested in (87%) partnering with patients and/or caregivers in research. Resources to assist in training, coordination of partners, guidance in apply for funding and improved infrastructure were commonly cited factors that would help researchers conduct PC-CER.

Conclusion: There is a significant opportunity for researchers to engage patients and caregivers as partners in CER. Researchers recognize the need for additional training and expertise to leverage those opportunities.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness research; engagement; health researchers.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research / methods*
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Health Care Surveys / methods*
  • Health Care Surveys / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Research Personnel / psychology*
  • Research Personnel / statistics & numerical data*