Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: analysis of 71 patients from a single institution

Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1841. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing use of robotic surgery for rectal cancer, few series have been published from the practice of generalizable US surgeons.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 71 consecutive patients who underwent robotic low anterior resection (LAR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2014.

Results: 46 LARs (65%) and 25 APRs (35%) were identified. Median procedure time was 219 minutes (IQR 184-275) and mean blood loss 164.9 cc (SD 155.9 cc). Radial margin was negative in 70/71 (99%) patients. Total mesorectal excision integrity was complete/near complete in 38/39 (97%) of graded specimens. A mean of 16.8 (SD+/- 8.9) lymph nodes were retrieved. At median follow-up of 21.9 months, there were no local recurrences.

Conclusions: Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer was introduced into typical colorectal surgery practice by a single surgeon, with a low conversion rate, low complication rate, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes.

Keywords: proctectomy; rectal cancer; robotic.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Body Mass Index
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / instrumentation
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / methods*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Robotics / instrumentation
  • Robotics / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States