Accuracy of Clinician Predictions of Future Self-Harm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictive Studies

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Feb;49(1):23-40. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12395. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

Abstract

Assessment of a patient after hospital-treated self-harm or psychiatric hospitalization often includes a risk assessment, resulting in a classification of high risk versus low risk for a future episode of self-harm. Through systematic review and a series of meta-analyses looking at unassisted clinician risk classification (eight studies; N = 22,499), we found pooled estimates for sensitivity 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.50), specificity 0.85 (0.75-0.92), positive predictive value 0.22 (0.21-0.23), and negative predictive value 0.89 (0.86-0.92). Clinician classification was too inaccurate to be clinically useful. After-care should therefore be allocated on the basis of a needs rather than risk assessment.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aftercare* / methods
  • Aftercare* / psychology
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders / epidemiology
  • Mental Disorders / psychology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Psychological Techniques*
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / diagnosis
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / psychology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity