Comparison of Self-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Tool vs. Researcher Administered Tool in the Emergency Department

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that there is a high rate of post traumatic stress disorder in the inner city.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients in the Emergency Department would use a post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessment. Additionally, did the type of administration of the PTSD tool impact the usage of PTSD services?

Methods: The sample population was taken from patients, 12 years or older, who presented with a non psychiatric illness. This study was done at a level one inner city adult and pediatric Emergency Department. The PTSD validated survey, was randomized between being self or research fellow administered. Half of the patients completed the survey on their own and half were administered by a research fellow. Those who screen positive on the tool were contacted one week later. This was done to determine if they have scheduled an appointment or were seen for a follow-up appointment. This study was IRB approved.

Results: A total of 299 participants completed the survey. Half (149) of which used a PTSD tool that was self administered. The total amount of participants who tested positive for PTSD was 35% (105). There was a significant difference (0.01) between those who self administered the tool 26% (40) and those who had the tool administered 12% (18). This was seen in relationship to who was more likely to follow up with behavioral health referrals.

Conclusions: These results reveal that 35% of the participants tested positive for PTSD. The majority of those that screened positive and used follow up services had self administered the tool. This indicates that they are more likely to seek out services based on their results.

Keywords: Emergency medicine; Follow up; Post traumatic stress syndrome; Self administer.