Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: A reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer

Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):502-508. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13056. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication.

Data source/study design: Pooled cross-sectional 2010-2011 Hospital Compare data (10/1/10 and 10/1/11 archives) and the 2012 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.

Data extraction: We used 71 indicators of structure, process, and outcomes of hospital care in a principal component analysis of Ridit scores to evaluate the dimensionality of the indicators. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using only the indicators in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.

Principal findings: There were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions.

Conclusions: Hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality. Treating hospital quality as unidimensional leads to erroneous conclusions about the performance of different hospitals.

Keywords: Quality of care/patient safety (measurement); hospitals; patient experience.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. / standards
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. / statistics & numerical data*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals / standards
  • Hospitals / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care / standards
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • United States
  • Value-Based Purchasing / standards
  • Value-Based Purchasing / statistics & numerical data*