Decisional regret in left ventricular assist device patient-caregiver dyads

Heart Lung. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):400-404. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.05.003.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate decisional regret among left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients and their caregivers.

Methods: This study was a single center, cross-sectional survey of patients after LVAD implantation and their caregivers. Subjects were recruited at their outpatient heart failure appointments. Patients and caregivers at least three months from LVAD implantation completed a 5-item, validated decisional regret scale. Summative scores on a 0-100 point scale were determined for patient and caregivers (0 = no regret). Subgroup analysis included gender, LVAD indication (bridge to transplant (BTT) or destination therapy (DT)), time from LVAD implantation, and caregiver relationship. Dyad discordance was defined as a patient-caregiver difference of ≥2 points on any regret scale question.

Results: Fifty patients were approached for participation. Thirty-three LVAD patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled in the study (19 male, 14 female patients; 8 male, 25 female caregivers). Patients had a mean age of approximately 50 years. Caregivers had a mean age of approximately 54 years. Patients had a median regret score of 10 (Interquartile range (IQR): 0-30), while caregivers had a median regret score of 20 (IQR: 0-25). Median regret scores of female patients were significantly higher than that of male patients (27.5 vs 0, p = 0.0038). BTT patients had numerically lower regret than DT patients, but this was not statistically significant. Patients who had been implanted for greater than three years had the highest regret scores. Discordance in at least one domain of the regret scale was present in 19 out of 33 (57.6%) dyads.

Conclusions: While decisional regret was reasonably low in this population, comparatively, there was significantly increased decisional regret among female patients and patients further from LVAD implantation. Differences between patients and caregivers were also observed. These findings highlight the need for robust support and continual attention to expectations before and after LVAD implantation.

Keywords: Decisional regret; Left ventricular assist device; Stage D heart failure.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Caregivers / psychology*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Decision Making*
  • Emotions / physiology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Failure / psychology
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Heart-Assist Devices*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult