Current medical management of pulmonary embolism (PE) is driven by risk stratification, with thrombolytic treatment reserved for patients with hemodynamic instability. We describe a case of a man with acute submassive bilateral pulmonary emboli and a right popliteal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), who had persistent shortness of breath, tachycardia, and hypoxemia but remained normotensive and was therefore not treated with thrombolytics until he suffered a fatal cardiac arrest on hospital day six. We examine the indications, risks, and potential benefits of thrombolytic treatment in patients with submassive PE who exhibit signs of instability but do not meet current indications for thrombolytic treatment with persistent hypotension or shock.
Keywords: anticoagulation; hemodynamic instability; pe; pulmonary embolism; thrombolytics.