Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lung lobectomy has emerged as an alternative approach to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Patient-reported outcomes comparing these approaches have been limited.
Methods: At a single, high-volume academic center, patients undergoing VATS and RATS lobectomies for stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer from 2014 to 2018 were evaluated. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire in Lung Cancer (QLQ-LC13), along with the Fear of Recurrence (FoR) survey, were administered preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Raw scores underwent linear transformation (0-100 scale). Linear mixed-effects models were used for quality of life and FoR score comparisons.
Results: The study included 219 patients (139 VATS and 80 RATS). RATS patients had longer (P < .05) operative times and a higher incidence (P < .05) of postoperative myocardial infarction compared to VATS patients. VATS patients reported higher (P < .05) QLQ-C30 summary scores postoperatively and at 12 months, including higher (P < .05) Social Functioning and Cognitive scores, and less (P < .05) appetite loss. VATS patients reported decreased (P < .05) QLQ-LC13 symptom summary scores at 6 months postoperatively, including decreased (P < .05) dyspnea, neuropathy, and pain compared with RATS patients. VATS patients also reported lower (P < .05) FoR summary scores at 6 months postoperatively.
Conclusions: VATS patients report improvement in select quality of life and FoR measures after lobectomy. Further study comparing these 2 approaches is required.
Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.