Effect of statewide reduction in extended care facility use after joint replacement on hospital readmission

Surgery. 2021 Feb;169(2):341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.043. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Abstract

Background: Extended care facility use is a primary driver of variation in hospitalization-associated health care payments and is increasingly a focus for savings under episode-based payment. However, concerns remain that extended care facility limits could incur rising readmissions, emergency department use, or other costs. We analyzed the effects of a statewide value improvement initiative to decrease extended care facility use after lower extremity arthroplasty on extended care facility use, readmission, emergency department use, and payments.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using complete claims from the Michigan Value Collaborative for patients undergoing lower extremity joint replacement. We compared the change in extended care facility use before (2012-2013) and after (2016-2017) the aforementioned statewide initiative with 90-day postacute care, readmission, and emergency department rates and payments using t tests.

Results: Of the patients included, 68,537 underwent total knee arthroplasty; 27,131 underwent total hip arthroplasty. Statewide, extended care facility use and postacute care payments decreased (extended care facility: 27.5% before vs 18.1% after, payments: $4,999 vs $3,832, P < .0001) without increased readmission rates (8.0% vs 7.6%, P = .10) or payments ($1,087 vs $1,026, P = .14). Emergency department use increased (7.8% vs 8.9%, P < .0001). Per hospital, there was no association between extended care facility use change and readmission rate change (r = 0.05). Hospital change in extended care facility use ranged from +2.3% (no extended care facility decrease group) to -16.6% (large extended care facility decrease group) and was associated with lower total episode payments without differences in change in readmission rate/payments or emergency department use.

Conclusion: Despite decreased use of extended care facilities, there was no compensatory increase in readmission rate or payments. Reducing excess use of extended care facilities after joint replacement may be an important opportunity for savings in episode-based reimbursement.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administrative Claims, Healthcare / statistics & numerical data
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / economics
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / rehabilitation*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / economics
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / rehabilitation*
  • Cost Savings / standards
  • Cost Savings / statistics & numerical data
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Overuse / economics
  • Medical Overuse / prevention & control*
  • Medical Overuse / statistics & numerical data
  • Medicare / economics
  • Medicare / standards
  • Medicare / statistics & numerical data
  • Michigan
  • Patient Readmission / economics
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data
  • Patient Transfer / economics
  • Patient Transfer / standards
  • Patient Transfer / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities / economics
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities / statistics & numerical data*
  • Subacute Care / economics
  • Subacute Care / standards
  • Subacute Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • United States