Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

Abstract

Background: Physician compensation incentives may have positive or negative effects on clinical quality.

Objective: To assess the association between various physician compensation incentives on technical indicators of primary care quality.

Design: Cross-sectional, nationally representative retrospective analysis.

Participants: Visits by adults to primary care physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012-2016. We analyzed 49,580 sampled visits, representing 1.45 billion primary care visits.

Main measures: We assessed the association between 5 compensation incentives - quality measure performance, patient experience scores, individual productivity, practice financial performance, or practice efficiency - and 10 high-value and 7 low-value care measures as well as high-value and low-value care composites.

Key results: Quality measure performance was an incentive in 22% of visits; patient experience scores, 17%; individual productivity, 57%; practice financial performance, 63%; and practice efficiency, 12%. In adjusted models, none of the compensation incentives were consistently associated with individual high- and low-value measures. None of the compensation incentives were associated with high- or low-value care composites. For example, quality measure performance compensation was not significantly associated with high-value care (visits with quality incentive, 47% of eligible measures met; without quality incentive, 43%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.15) or low-value care (aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19). Physician compensation incentives that might be expected to increase low-value care did not: patient experience (aOR for low-value care composite, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.05), individual productivity (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.88-1.22), and practice financial performance (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.36).

Conclusion: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, nationally representative analysis of care in the United States, physician compensation incentives were not generally associated with more or less high- or low-value care.

Keywords: Incentives; Physician Compensation; Primary Care; Quality of Care.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Motivation*
  • Physician Incentive Plans
  • Physicians, Primary Care*
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • United States