Background: The impact of published evidence on clinical practice has been understudied in pediatric cardiology.
Objective: We sought to assess changes in prescribing behavior for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and digoxin at discharge after initial palliation of infants with single ventricle (SV) physiology following the publication of two large studies: The Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle (PHN-ISV) trial showing no benefit with routine ACEI use and the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) analysis showing an association between digoxin and survival.
Methods: ICD-9-10 codes identified SV infants from the Pediatric Health Information System (1/2004 to 1/2018) and charge codes identified medications at discharge. Generalized estimating equations implementing segmented logistic regressions modeled medication use, before and after (with a 3-month washout period) the relevant publication (ACEI 7/1/2010; digoxin 4/1/2016). A subgroup analysis was performed for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS).
Results: ACEI use (37 centers, n = 4700) at discharge did not change over time during the pre-publication period. After publication of the PHN-ISV trial, ACEI use decreased (OR: 0.61, CI 0.44-0.84, p = 0.003). Digoxin use (43 centers, n = 4778) decreased by 1% monthly before publication. After the NPC-QIC publication, digoxin use increased (OR: 2.07, CI 1.05-4.08, p = 0.04) with an ongoing increase of 9% per month. Results were similar for the HLHS subgroup.
Conclusions: Prescribing behavior changed congruently after the publication of evidence-based studies, with decreased ACEI use and increased digoxin use at discharge following initial palliation of SV infants. Our findings suggest scientific findings were rapidly implemented into clinical practice.
Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Provider behavior; Single ventricle.