This letter to the editor provides a response to "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery." The authors provide much needed clarification on misconceptions of flow disruption studies. The evolving methodology is not aimed at creating a "non-stop" flow, or optimizing efficiency, but understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.
Keywords: Flow disruptions; Robot-assisted surgery; Systems safety.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.