Background: Debate still exists regarding the benefits of unicompartmental (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis. The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare the early outcomes of UKA versus TKA.
Methods: One-hundred and seven candidates for UKA were randomized at two centers; 57 candidates received UKA and 50 received TKA. Six-week and 6-month outcome measures including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Knee Society Score (KSS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and VR-12 global health scores were obtained. No demographic or baseline patient reported outcome (PRO) differences were present suggesting successful randomization (P > .05).
Results: UKA demonstrated shorter operative times (UKA = 65 minutes, TKA = 74 minutes; P < .001) and length of stay (UKA = 0.7 nights, TKA = 1.2 nights; P < .01). At 6 weeks, there were no differences in KOOS, JR (P = .755), KSS (P = .754), FJS (P = .664), or PRO change from preoperative scores (P = .468). There were three surgical complications within 90 days in each group. The duration of opioid consumption (UKA = 33.8 days, TKA = 28.5 days; P = .290) and return to work (UKA = 57.1 days, TKA = 47.3 days; P = .346) did not differ between groups.
Conclusion: Data suggest no clinically significant differences between UKA and TKA in the early postoperative period in regards to patient-reported outcome measures, duration of opioid use, or return to work. Patients undergoing UKA can anticipate a shorter length of stay and greater early range of motion. All-cause short-term complications may be more prevalent with TKA.
Keywords: knee; osteoarthritis; outcome; partial knee replacement; total knee replacement.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.