The evolving gender distribution in authorship over time in American surgery

Am J Surg. 2022 Nov;224(5):1217-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.029. Epub 2022 May 25.

Abstract

Background: The need for gender parity within academic surgery has resulted in an analysis of the trends in female authorship in the American general surgery literature.

Methods: Original articles from five American surgical journals from 1997, 2007, and 2017 were reviewed. Trends in the proportion of female authors were evaluated.

Results: There was an incremental increase in female first authors over the three time periods (15% in 1997, 32.2% in 2007, and 52.7% in 2017; P < 0.001). The proportion of articles by female senior authors also increased over the study periods (18.7% in 1997, 28.8% in 2007, and 52.6% in 2017; P < 0.001). However, there were fewer female authors with basic science research publications than males (17.4% vs. 82.6%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The academic productivity of female surgeons have increased over time likely due to an increase in the number of female academic surgeons in recent years. These findings are encouraging and demonstrate progress in female representation in surgery.

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • Bibliometrics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • United States