Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) can be defined as objective measures that are sensitive and specific to changes in tissue physiology. Provided the acquired QIBs are not affected by scanner changes, they could play an important role in disease diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment monitoring. The precision of selected QIBs was assessed from data collected on a 3-T scanner in four healthy participants over a 5-year period. Inevitable scanner changes and acquisition protocol revisions occurred during this time. Standard and custom processing pipelines were used to calculate regional brain volume, cortical thickness, T2, T2*, quantitative susceptibility, cerebral blood flow, axial, radial and mean diffusivity, peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy from the acquired images. Coefficient of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation (ICC) indices were determined in the short-term (i.e., repeatable over three acquisitions within 4 weeks) and in the long-term (i.e., reproducible over four acquisition sessions in 5 years). Precision indices varied based on acquisition technique, processing pipeline, and anatomical region. Good repeatability (average CoV=2.40% and ICC=0.78) and reproducibility (average CoV=8.86 % and ICC=0.72) were found over all QIBs. The best performance indices were obtained for diffusion derived biomarkers (CoV∼0.96% and ICCs=0.87); conversely, the poorest indices were found for the cerebral blood flow biomarker (CoV>10% and ICC<0.5). These results demonstrate that changes in protocol, along with hardware and software upgrades, did not affect the estimates of the selected biomarkers and their precision. Further characterization of the QIB is necessary to understand meaningful changes in the biomarkers in longitudinal studies of normal brain aging and translation to clinical research.
Keywords: Brain; Healthy controls; QIB; Quantitative MR; Repeatability; Reproducibility.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.