Povidone-iodine intra-abdominal irrigation versus no irrigation in pediatric perforated appendicitis: A secondary economic analysis of a Bayesian randomized controlled trial

Am J Surg. 2024 Jan:227:157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Abstract

Background: A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in children (2-17 ​y) with perforated appendicitis demonstrated an 89% probability of reduced intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) rate with povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation, compared with no irrigation (NI). We hypothesized that PVI also reduced 30-day hospital costs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective economic analysis of a pilot RCT. Hospital costs, inflated to 2019 U.S. dollars, were obtained for index admissions and 30-day emergency visits and readmissions. Cost differences between groups were assessed using frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear models.

Results: We observed a 95% Bayesian probability that PVI reduced 30-day mean total hospital costs ($16,555 [PVI] versus $18,509 [NI]; Bayesian cost ratio: 0.90, 95% CrI, 0.78-1.03). The mean absolute difference per patient was $1,954 less with PVI (95% CI, -$4,288 to $379).

Conclusions: PVI likely reduced the IAA rate and 30-day hospital costs, suggesting the intervention is both clinically superior and cost saving.

Keywords: Healthcare costs; Intra-abdominal irrigation; Perforated appendicitis; Povidone-iodine.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Abscess* / therapy
  • Adolescent
  • Appendectomy
  • Appendicitis* / complications
  • Appendicitis* / surgery
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Humans
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Povidone-Iodine / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Povidone-Iodine