Introduction: Ventral hernia repair cost the U.S. healthcare system nearly 3 billion dollars annually. Surgical repair is a critical competency for residents yet hernia recurrence rates following mesh-based repair range from 0.8% to 24%. Improving surgical techniques using cadavers is often cost-prohibited for many education programs and limited research exists using simulation models with a corresponding hernia repair curriculum in the graduate medical education setting. This pilot project aimed to develop a low cost, easily reproducible novel abdominal wall reconstruction model and pilot-test the ventral hernia repair curriculum to inform further refinement prior to formal evaluation.
Material and methods: This descriptive study pilot-tested the newly refined Abdominal Wall Surgical Skills Operative Model (AWSSOM) simulator for ventral hernia repair with mesh and its corresponding 2-h training curriculum for use at all levels of general surgery graduate medical education. The AWSSOM is a 3D printed synthetic anatomically realistic abdominal wall model consisting of silicone cured layers of skin, fat, rectus abdominis and a posterior rectus sheath fascia, and silicone tubules to simulate lateral neurovascular bundles. The curriculum incorporated didactic content reflecting surgical practice guidelines, hands-on practice, and faculty guidance promoting interactive critical thinking development during task performance. A pre-/post-assessment included a 10-item knowledge test, a 19-item psychomotor assessment, and 4-items confidence survey to examine changes in performance, knowledge, and confidence in competently completing the ventral hernia repair technique. Descriptive statistics were used to report the limited results of six military surgical resident participants and inform further model and curriculum refinement prior to formal evaluation.
Results: The five-layer AWSSOM model was manufactured in 65 h at a material cost of $87 per model frame, is reusable model, and secure base. Six surgical residents were recruited; only four completed both pre- and post-tests due to resident schedule conflicts. The average increase in knowledge was 25%, although variable changes in confidence were observed over the four program year participants. A larger sample size and a control group are needed to demonstrate curriculum effectiveness at improving knowledge, performance, and confidence in ventral hernia repair with mesh and better delineate if high scores translate to better operative skills. A key improvement requested by residents was a more secure model base for dissection and performance of the hernia repair.
Conclusions: The novel abdominal wall surgical skills operative model fills an important proof of concept gap in simulation training. It is low cost with the potential to improve cognitive and psychomotor skills, as well as confidence to competently complete ventral hernia repair with mesh in the graduate medical education setting. Prior to formal effectiveness testing, our lessons learned should be addressed in both the model and curriculum. Future studies must include an adequately powered statistical evaluation with a larger sample across all levels of training.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.