Preoperative gastric point-of-care ultrasound in nonelective surgical procedures in pediatric-aged patients

Anuranjan Ghimire; Alok Moharir; Yoshikazu Yamaguchi; Nguyen K Tram; Joseph D Tobias

doi:10.4103/sja.sja_379_23

Preoperative gastric point-of-care ultrasound in nonelective surgical procedures in pediatric-aged patients

Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Jan-Mar;18(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_379_23. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

Authors

Anuranjan Ghimire¹, Alok Moharir^{1

2}, Yoshikazu Yamaguchi^{1

3}, Nguyen K Tram^{1

2}, Joseph D Tobias^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, Japan.
² Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, Japan.
³ Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Airway management for nonelective surgical procedures in the setting of trauma, pain, and opioid use can be complicated by the potential for aspiration due to delayed gastric emptying. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) remains a useful tool for evaluating gastric content and volume in various clinical settings. The authors evaluated gastric volume and content in children scheduled for urgent and semi-urgent procedures to assess their aspiration risk.

Methods: After obtaining consent, gastric POCUS was performed in the preoperative holding area for pediatric patients scheduled for both elective and nonelective surgery. Qualitative and quantitative measurements of the gastric antrum were taken, and the risk of gastric aspiration was calculated. Additional data collected included patient demographics, the type of surgery, nil per os (NPO) status at the time of surgery, NPO status at the time of injury, and administration of opioids.

Results: The study cohort included 100 patients ranging in age from 3 to 17 years old (mean age 9.2 years). Out of these 100 patients, gastric scanning was successfully conducted in 98 patients. Sixteen of fifty-nine nonelective patients (27%) had received opioids for pain control prior to surgery. Among the 34 patients who had suffered an acute injury, 7 (21%) had been NPO for <8 hours at the time of the injury. Ninety-nine out of hundred patients had been NPO for at least 6 hours at the time of the gastric ultrasound. Based on our gastric ultrasound findings, all patients who were appropriately NPO had either Grade 0 or Grade 1 risk for aspiration, indicating a low risk of aspiration.

Conclusions: The preliminary data show that when patients presenting for nonelective surgery are appropriately NPO, they may have a low risk of aspiration. This information may help guide the choice of anesthetic induction technique, particularly when concerns exist about the safety of a rapid sequence induction. It allows for a more stable and controlled induction of anesthesia.

Keywords: Gastric ultrasound; nil per os; point-of-care; ultrasound.