Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an immunologic condition with an estimated prevalence of 0.1%. For CSU that is poorly controlled despite the use of antihistamines, omalizumab is the only treatment approved and recommended by international guidelines.
Objective: Our aim was to outline the impact of treatment accessibility on CSU outcomes in the real world.
Methods: Serial data on adult patients with CSU receiving care for at least 6 months at a dedicated, immunologist-led urticaria clinic at Grantham Hospital in Hong Kong between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients' clinicodemographic data, drug eligibility status (eligible for reimbursement or not), treatment step, and disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]) were collected and compared according to drug eligibility status.
Results: This study included 238 patients, 80 (33.6%) of whom were eligible for reimbursement and 158 of whom were not. No significant clinicodemographic differences, including disease activity, were found at baseline. At latest follow-up, significantly more patients in the eligible group were receiving omalizumab (28.7% vs 5.7% [P < .001]), which is equivalent to a multivariate odds ratio of 9.35 (95% CI = 3.689-23.703 [P < .001]). The discrepancy persisted even in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU whose UAS7 was 16 or higher (40.6% [13 of 32] vs 10.2% [6 of 59]; P < .001). In addition, there was significantly less dose reduction (<300 mg every 4 weeks) in the eligible omalizumab users (4.3% vs 44.4% [P = .015]). Clinically, significantly greater improvements in UAS7 were reported by the eligible group (median change -8.0 vs -5.0 [P = .021]).
Conclusion: Patterns of management varied largely among patients with different drug eligibility statuses and led to disparities in health outcomes. More efforts to secure equitable access to guideline-based CSU care are warranted.
Keywords: CSU; Urticaria; biologics; chronic urticaria; equity; health disparities.
© 2024 The Author(s).