Can a reconstruction algorithm in major acetabular bone loss be successful in revision hip arthroplasty?

Bone Joint J. 2024 May 1;106-B(5 Supple B):47-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B5.BJJ-2023-0809.R1.

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to determine the success of a reconstruction algorithm used in major acetabular bone loss, and to further define the indications for custom-made implants in major acetabular bone loss.

Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of Paprosky type III acetabular defects treated according to a reconstruction algorithm. IIIA defects were planned to use a superior augment and hemispherical acetabular component. IIIB defects were planned to receive either a hemispherical acetabular component plus augments, a cup-cage reconstruction, or a custom-made implant. We used national digital health records and registry reports to identify any reoperation or re-revision procedure and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) for patient-reported outcomes. Implant survival was determined via Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 105 procedures were carried out in 100 patients (five bilateral) with a mean age of 73 years (42 to 94). In the IIIA defects treated, 72.0% (36 of 50) required a porous metal augment; the remaining 14 patients were treated with a hemispherical acetabular component alone. In the IIIB defects, 63.6% (35 of 55) underwent reconstruction as planned with 20 patients who actually required a hemispherical acetabular component alone. At mean follow-up of 7.6 years, survival was 94.3% (95% confidence interval 97.4 to 88.1) for all-cause revision and the overall dislocation rate was 3.8% (4 of 105). There was no difference observed in survival between type IIIA and type IIIB defects and whether a hemispherical implant alone was used for the reconstruction or not. The mean gain in OHS was 16 points. Custom-made implants were only used in six cases, in patients with either a mega-defect in which the anteroposterior diameter > 80 mm, complex pelvic discontinuity, and massive bone loss in a small pelvis.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a reconstruction algorithm can provide a successful approach to reconstruction in major acetabular bone loss. The use of custom implants has been defined in this series and accounts for < 5% of cases.

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum* / surgery
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* / methods
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation* / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome