The aim of this review was to highlight why the use of master protocols trial design is particularly useful for radiotherapy intervention trials where complex-set up pathways (including quality assurance, user training, integrating multiple modalities of treatment) may hinder clinical advances. We carried out a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines, reviewing the findings using a landscape analysis. Results were summarised descriptively, reporting on trial characteristics highlighting the benefits, limitations, and challenges of developing and implementing radiotherapy master protocols with three case studies selected to explore these issues in more detail. 12 studies were suitable for inclusion (4 platform trials, 3 umbrella trials, and 5 basket trials), evaluating a mix of solid tumour sites in both curative and palliative settings. The interventions were categorised into 1. Novel agent and radiotherapy combinations; 2. Radiotherapy dose personalisation; and 3. Device evaluation, with a case study provided for each intervention. Benefits of master protocol trials for radiotherapy intervention include: protocol efficiency for implementation of novel radiotherapy techniques; accelerating the evaluation of novel agent drug and radiotherapy combinations; and more efficient translational research opportunities, leading to cost savings and research efficiency to improve patient outcomes. Master protocols offer an innovative platform under which multiple clinical questions can be addressed within a single trial. Due to the complexity of radiotherapy trial set up, cost and research efficiency savings may be more apparent than in systemic treatment trials. Use of this research approach may be the change needed to push forward oncological innovation within radiation oncology.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.