Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

108 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.
Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, Taplin SH, Sickles EA; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Kerlikowske K, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):493-502. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22007043 Free PMC article.
Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A, Kerlikowske K, Stout NK, Miglioretti DL, Schechter CB, Ergun MA, van den Broek JJ, Alagoz O, Sprague BL, van Ravesteyn NT, Near AM, Gangnon RE, Hampton JM, Chandler Y, de Koning HJ, Mandelblatt JS, Tosteson AN; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium and the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network. Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 15;165(10):700-712. doi: 10.7326/M16-0476. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27548583 Free PMC article.
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Ernster VL, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002. PMID: 12381707
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Dignan M, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash R. Carney PA, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12558355
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JW, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R, Yankaskas BC. Sickles EA, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):775-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353040738. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15914475
Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BA, Onega TL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Harvey JA, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):752-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120221. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23249570 Free PMC article.
Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.
Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L, Lehman CD, Onega T, Kerlikowske K, Henderson LM, Geller BM, Hofmann M, Yankaskas BC; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Wernli KJ, et al. Among authors: yankaskas bc. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):125-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24247555 Free PMC article.
108 results